UK Government Consultation | Deadline: 16 December
How do these dangerous plans impact the whole UK?
The Government’s plans for abortion regulations looks set to become more liberal than those already in place in England, Wales and Scotland. Evidence from the Government’s consultation document suggests a far more lenient, even cavalier approach to the limits and circumstances for a legal abortion. If the new legal regime is as liberal as anticipated, it will place the mental and physical health of women at risk. By implementing a relaxed legal system in Northern Ireland, it will set a precedent for the UK Parliament to amend the law accordingly for England and Wales, and for Scotland to follow suit.
On 22 October 2019, the UK Parliament passed the Northern Ireland (Executive Formation etc) Act 2019 As one of its provisions, this Act decriminalises abortion in Northern Ireland by repealing sections 58 and 59 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. Since 22 October, the Act has also put in place a moratorium on prosecutions related to abortion. The new law places a duty on the UK government to establish regulations covering abortion for Northern Ireland by 31 March 2020.
Welsh Government Consultation | Deadline: 28 November
Why is this relevant to the whole UK?
Laws enacted in any one part of the UK set a precedent and will almost certainly be used by campaigners in the rest of the UK to press ahead for legal changes conforming with the newly inaugurated laws. Should the Welsh Government implement their proposals, this is capable of sending a message to the Westminster parliament for England to follow suit.
Citizens throughout the UK are invited to respond to the current consultation. The Welsh Government has not restricted eligible respondents to people living in Wales.
What is the Welsh Government proposing?
In a radical overhaul of the Welsh curriculum, the proposals include, among other things:
Government Consultation | April – June 2019
The Department for Education is consulting on proposals which include establishing a registration
scheme for parents who home-educate their children, requiring them to register with their local
authority, and also establishing a registration scheme maintained by local authorities, of children not
attending state-funded or registered independent schools.
The government states that it has no intention of altering the basic right of parents to home educate
their children. However, if the government’s registration proposals are implemented, there are
legitimate concerns this could lead a future government to take the further step of establishing a
system of mandatory state monitoring and oversight of educational content provided to home
Currently, Ofsted, as HM State Inspectorate of Schools in England, has the role of inspecting school
standards, childcare, adoption and fostering agencies but does not oversee or inspect education
provided in the home. Ofsted does conduct periodic inspections of local authorities, which includes
reporting on how they implement their legal duties that relate to vulnerable children. Ofsted also
looks into how local authorities identify children who are not in receipt of a suitable education, and
the steps taken to tackle this problem.
This consultation follows an earlier consultation and call for evidence held by the Department for
Education in 2018. Some of the issues included were: registration of children who are home
educated; voluntary registration schemes run by some local authorities; monitoring by local
authorities of the suitability of home education; support for home educating families, what good
practice is, and the question of a duty on local authorities to provide support, if requested.
Voice for Justice UK produced its own briefing on this Consultation
Children not in school: Proposed Legislation Government Consultation
Government Online Survey
VfJUK Briefing, Home Educating Your Children – What Does the Law Say?
Elective Home Education: Call for Evidence 2018: Government Consultation Response
Call for Evidence | November 2018 – January 2019
In March 2018, the Home Office set up what is described as an independent Commission for Countering Extremism with the purpose of challenging “all forms of extremism” and advising the Government on “new policies to deal with extremism, including the need for new powers.” The Commission’s remit does not include a study of terrorism. The Commission recognises that definitions of “extremism” vary and that there is no legal definition in the UK. In the Spring of 2019, the Commission intends to publish a study on “all forms of extremism” with reference to England and Wales.
The Government is to be applauded in their efforts to tackle and defeat ideologies peddling incitement to violence and murder, including the overthrow of democracy. However, there is a real and present danger that Bible believing Christians will be labelled ‘extremist’.
Public figures have already pointed to concerns about how law-abiding Christians are at risk of being caught by the vagueness of the term “extremism”. Lord Evans, former head of MI5, wrote in 2015 when the Government sought to pass the Counter-Extremism Bill: “definitions will be crucial . . . One can imagine already the powers being used against harmless evangelical street preachers or the like, out of misplaced zeal and a desire to demonstrate that they are not directed against one religion alone”. In 2014, when extremism disruption orders were debated by parliament, the then Justice Minister, Dominic Raab, wrote that their broad powers could be abused; “Those engaged in passionate debates – such as Christians objecting to gay marriage – could find themselves slapped down.” In 2016, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, reportedly declared that he is an “extremist” according to the government definition, because faith could, in some cases, outweigh the rule of law, one of the fundamental British values which are taken as markers of integration. He noted that the government’s religious illiteracy meant it was unable to distinguish between groups like the Muslim Brotherhood and a “sort of conservative evangelical group in a Church of England church.”
Evidence in the public domain show how three members of the Commission hold divisive and dangerous views about Bible-believing Christians that disqualify them in these public roles, contrary to the Code of Conduct that obliges members of public bodies to be impartial. Where a member of a public body has a conflict of interest, such conflicts must be declared, and the individual must not participate in discussions or decisions where the interest suggests a danger of bias.
Government Consultation | September – December 2018
The government is consulting on a radical and controversial overhaul of the law on divorce in England and Wales. One of the main reforms would be to allow divorce on mere notification of irretrievable breakdown by either one or both spouses, abolishing any need to provide evidence of fault, i.e., providing a legal reason why the marriage has broken down. This would make divorce into a purely administrative process where one spouse could in effect walk free of the marriage by notification.
When the reason for marriage breakdown is not legally needed as a condition for divorce, this is sometimes known as “no-fault” divorce. Other aspects of the proposed changes include abolishing the right of a spouse to contest a divorce. Of the consultation, the Government “seeks views on the detail of how best to change the law to reduce family conflict and strengthen family responsibility.” It claims this consultation marks its “commitment to strengthen support for children and families”. The argument that allowing no-fault divorce is somehow capable of strengthening families is deeply controversial, and we understand that such provision will weaken families and undermine the security of children.
The last major reform of divorce law took place nearly fifty years ago. The Government’s current proposals for no-fault divorce builds on an existing campaign pushed by The Times newspaper and Sir Paul Coleridge of the Marriage Foundation.
Government Consultation | July – November 2018
The Children and Social Work Act 2017 placed a duty on the Education Secretary to make Relationships Education (RelEd) compulsory at primary school, and Relationships and Sex Education (RSE) compulsory at secondary school. This duty would be accomplished through regulations (Relationships Education, Relationships and Sex Education and Health Education (England) Regulations 2019). The 2017 Act further gave discretionary power to the Secretary of State for Education to make Personal, Social, Health and Economic Education (PSHE), or elements of it, compulsory in all schools.
The Department for Education had previously issued a Call for Evidence, when views were sought from organisations on subject content. The Government has said that these findings helped shape the form of the draft regulations, statutory guidance and regulatory impact assessment, which became the subject of the Consultation on RelEd and RSE, opened on 19 July 2018, closing on 7 November 2018.
The statutory draft guidance contains both the content to which schools will need to have regard in their delivery of RelEd, RSE and PSHE, and also the legal obligations falling on schools in their teaching of these three fields.
This Consultation sought views from all parties on the draft regulations and statutory guidance relating to RelEd and RSE and PSHE. It also sought opinions as to whether this guidance provided sufficient information and support to schools in the teaching these subjects.
The Department for Education has said it will consider the responses submitted to the consultation process when it finalises the draft regulations and statutory guidance. The Regulations will then be put before Parliament for final debate before implementation by Statutory Instrument, at which point the Department for Education will also publish its accompanying Guidance.